![]() ![]() Even Lisa and mom can drink it (but as of tonight, Lisa prefers the Jim Beam since it’s sweeter – see below).Ĭabin Fever has a great maple/whiskey color unlike either the Jim Beam (light tan) or the Crown (medium brown)… it’s just wonderful all around. Though I prefer it on ice, I could also drink it neat. It does give you a nice warm feeling throughout. It doesn’t burn either on the way down or once it settles in your stomach (the crown burned for so long…). The maple is definitely present but not overpowering. I couldn’t do that if it was really sweet. I can drink more than one glass in a sitting. Cabin Fever isn’t as sweet as maple syrup (my brother says it is, but he also just prefers straight whiskey without any flavor at all), but still tastes like it. I finally was able to convince one store to try stocking it. ![]() I was so sad, but it renewed my motivation to get my hands on Cabin Fever. Think a mix of cleaning chemicals out of the cabinet combined with pesticides and you might be on the right track for what crown’s version of “maple” resembles… I gave the rest to my mom, who mixed with a bunch of other stuff to be able to cover the nastiness. I can’t even begin to describe what it tastes like other than having a heavily “chemical” taste (I was going to say “after taste” but it’s really like that from first sniff). It wasn’t sweet, but it also certainly wasn’t maple flavor. The chemical taste overpowered even the alcohol flavor. Unfortunately, I about spilled the remainder of my glasses as I spit out what was in my mouth. I took it home excited to try something that could quell my thirst for Cabin Fever. They only had one size, so I reluctantly shelled out $32 for it. I caved and tried Crown’s new maple flavored whiskey. No one wanted to order it without me committing to buy an entire case (now, I love the stuff, but a case would last me a year and cost way too much). I visited a number of stores with no luck. Then we moved and something horrible happened: it was so new with so limited marketing, no one here carried it. I first tried Cabin Fever up north on a whim (ginormous package store, fresh paycheck, liked the thought of maple in my alcohol). ![]()
0 Comments
![]() ![]() Keep in mind that the first three in the small list below are the main ones: 1. You can carry out candidate searches using the four basic operators if you’re a professional recruiter at a high-level position and unaware of Basic Boolean for sourcing. However, consistency can grant better results and help you acquire the most qualified talent for your organization.Ĭheck out the basic Boolean modifiers and operators that help you acquire the most desired results when hunting for candidates on Google Search. Of course, mastering the approach as a recruiter with no prior experience can take a while. While Basic Boolean is widely used as an algorithm to screen candidates on social media and other internet platforms, the concept originated in 1847. You can think of Basic Boolean as a highly effective tool that helps screen major candidate-finding platforms for the best possible results to fill positions at your company. The exact process will prevent your search results from including candidates who don’t have the specific skill you’re looking for. For instance, using the Basic Boolean approach, you can find all possible candidates on LinkedIn who have listed copywriting as a skill. It’s even more effective when searching for candidates with specific instructions and qualities. The Basic Boolean approach helps you find relevant answers to candidate search queries across search engines and platforms. These platforms include LinkedIn, Google, Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS), and Candidate Relationship Management (CRM). You can apply Basic Boolean for sourcing on nearly all platforms where employers connect with potential employees. ![]() With Basic Boolean for sourcing, you can transform the hiring process by not sourcing every candidate yourself. ![]() In that case, Basic Boolean can ease the hiring process and take a massive burden off your shoulders. And considering how the number of social media users keeps growing, it begs the question, “how do you find the perfect candidate out of so many?” Because many people use LinkedIn and most are looking for a job, it’s pretty tricky to filter out candidates who fit your job description. Per the Jobvite Recruiter Nation Report of 2016, over 87% of recruiters like to go through potential candidates’ LinkedIn profiles. You may already know that LinkedIn is among the best social media platforms to help businesses connect with suitable job candidates. Basic Boolean operators can help you narrow down or broaden your candidate search when searching for suitable candidates to fill a job position in your organization. The most Basic Boolean operators include AND, OR, and NOT. ![]() What Does Basic Boolean for Sourcing Refer to?īasic Boolean for sourcing involves using a structured hiring process with several mathematical operators at its heart. Examples of such platforms include the Google search engine and some social media platforms. To improve your company’s hiring process as a recruiter, learn about the Basic Boolean operators that help form search strings according to the platform you’re using to find candidates. You’re probably wondering what the benefits of this approach are and how you can implement it seamlessly across your organization. Many officials at large corporate firms, including recruitment centers and agencies, have started using Boolean search in recruitment. Lucky for you, this post has a simple idea at the core, i.e., to take your recruiting process to the next level with the help of Basic Boolean. However, finding a guide in the job market that tells you how to hire the right person for a job is tricky. will find numerous guides on recruiting the best employees, what job boards to post on, and what questions to ask when you first meet them. ![]() ![]() ![]() Grateful for any pointers, or things to check, or that I should try doing. Hope that helps clarify the issue and the problem statements. Therefore, what should do and/or what settings should I be checking in Inkscape, to ensure that when exported, icon base' s transparency is exported as a transparent icon base ? Somehow, somewhere during the export process, icon base is losing its alpha channel (or that's what I think is happening, I could be wrong) The problem is: When I export the 2 selected objects as icon.png, in my game, I see the red Letter A alright, but the icon base IS NOT TRANSPARENT. So now I have 2 objects that I need to export as "the icon". So now, in Inkscape, when I select both objects, as expected, I see a transparent icon base with a red Letter A on top of it. I set the icon base's Alpha to 0, because I want icon base to be transparent in the final exported icon.png, and applied red paint to the Letter A. On one layer of the layers of the document, I created a simple square that is 10x10 px (call this the icon base), and then placed a Red A on top of it (call this the Letter A). Instead, I have 1 document with a transparent background document setting. And I can not use a 10px square inkscape document as the background as suggested as that does not scale to the size and needs of my project (many icons to create). I need to create an icon, that is 10 px square for a game (sorry, can't mention which one due to contract obligations). #2 Polygon ⚖ □, I sincerely appreciate your attempts at answers and questions, but reading them sounds to me like I was not clear, so let me try again:.What are the steps to make that rectangle appear transparent when I export my 10px sq A-icon please? I'd expect to see just the A without any background after its exported.īTW, I've opened the exported A icon in other tools like Krita, and there too I see a background - so the icon displays with a background in other drawing tools, not just the game. Somehow the rectangle is still picking up a background from somewhere when its being exported?. In all cases, I see a transparent rectangle in Inkscape, but when I export the 10px sq selected image, I see the A just fine, but the background rectangle is not transparent - its the color of the background set in the document setting background that I set to transparent (or the color if I used paint locally on the rectangle that I set to alhpa=0) * Placed the red A above the Rectangle in their stack order * In terms of the rectangle: A) Set the rectangle to have no paint B) Gave the rectangle paint, but then setting the paint opaque and Alpha both to 0 ![]() I also tried to used both black and white for the alpha0 setting, and also turned document background back on again as combinations for testing. * Setting the document background to transparent checkerboard, and its background color wheel alpha to 0. I'd expect to see just the A without any background as I see it in Inkscape, after its exported. The A is displaying OK, but so to is the rectangle as a painted object!. That's not happening after I export the selected A and rectangle. The problem is that I need to see the A, while the square that it sits on, should be transparent. (the rectangle is needed to set the dimensions of the exported A icon so that the icon is 10 px square in the game) ![]() I'm using inkscape to create some simple icons for a game.įor this issue, imagine a red letter A on a 10 px sq rectangle. I understand how to make a documents entire background transparent, but not sure how to make just 1 object transparent ** that stays transparent** when I export it. ![]() |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |